An abortion is the intentional killing of an unborn child inside (or partially inside) the womb.
Social justice is . . . what exactly?
Again and again I see young social justice-focused evangelicals abandoning any effective voice for the unborn for the sake of an ephemeral, culturally-fashionable concept that as a practical matter means little more than advocating a utopian ideal through a grab-bag of banal, functionally socialist policies. Moreover, the embrace of social justice often drives them functionally into the arms of a political party and political movements that are dedicated to protecting and even subsidizing the “right” to kill children on a vast, industrial scale.
Social justice must be virtuous indeed to be worth such a high cost. So, what is it?..
Read on. For David French exposes a key problem affecting young evangelicals (and Catholics) in this excellent LifeNews.com article.
And more than exposing the problem, he calls them out on it.
Friday, June 15, 2012
More Emmy Nominations for Pro-Life TV Series
I know it sounds incredible but it's true -- the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences has nominated a pro-life series for three regional Emmy Awards.
And it's a series that you can watch online.
The weekly series is a ministry from Life Issues Institute with Brad Mattes serving as host and executive producer. It's called Facing Life Head-On and it presents some of the very best television available for you and your family: informative, relevant and inspirational.
Here's more on the Emmy Award story and right here is where you can personally check out Facing Life Head-On.
And it's a series that you can watch online.
The weekly series is a ministry from Life Issues Institute with Brad Mattes serving as host and executive producer. It's called Facing Life Head-On and it presents some of the very best television available for you and your family: informative, relevant and inspirational.
Here's more on the Emmy Award story and right here is where you can personally check out Facing Life Head-On.
Topics:
Bioethics,
Christian Teaching,
Culture,
Heroes,
Media Matters,
Pro-Life Activities,
The Arts
Barack Obama's Campaign Re-Boot Is Re-Bad
John Hinderaker is at his best in exposing Barack Obama's insipid, boring, lying campaign speech in this Power Line article, "Obama’s Speech Signals More Trouble For His Campaign."
I print below a couple of excerpts and then below those i give you links to two related articles that I think you'll find of value. One is from Dana Milbank at the Washington Post and the other from John Nolte over at Breitbart.
But first, Hinderaker:
Critics almost universally panned Obama’s speech. It was too long, at 54 minutes. It was delivered in a dull, even defeatist style. It contained nothing new–neither new themes nor new policy proposals. It exhibited the whiny, blame-everyone-in-sight quality that has long been putting off voters. And, despite Obama’s endless talk about offering voters a clear choice, he continued to be strangely vague about what he actually wants to do if he gets a second term…
This is revisionist history. There was no “stalemate” in 2009 or 2010; the Democrats controlled all the levers of government. Barack Obama issued any executive orders that he deemed appropriate, and Congress passed all legislation on which Democrats could agree. Republicans had no ability to block Democrat-sponsored measures. So the Democrats passed the $850 billion stimulus, vastly increased discretionary spending, adopted Obamacare, and did anything else they pleased. That wasn’t “stalemate,” it was unfettered Democratic dominance.
But the Democrats’ policies turned out to be catastrophic failures. The stimulus failed to either hold down unemployment, which increased substantially, or to promote growth, which remained anemic. Obamacare proved immediately unpopular and placed heavy burdens on hiring by small businesses, thereby increasing the unemployment rate. The Democrats’ skyrocketing discretionary spending, stimulus and otherwise, was widely judged to be wasted. Its only tangible effect was to cause the national debt to grow three times faster than at any time in our history.
Americans were horrified by the results of the Obama administration’s policies in 2009 and 2010. Therefore, they turned out in November 2010 to stop the Democrats from more such follies. The Republicans, fueled by the Tea Party movement, took the House. Since 2011, there has, therefore, been some constraint on the Democrats’ ability to weaken the economy through massive increases in spending and debt. If this is “stalemate,” it is exactly what the voters chose in 2010...
* Milbank's article, "Skip the falsehoods, Mr. President, and give us a plan."
* Nolte's article, "Obama Speech 'Widely Panned' by Political Press Corps."
I print below a couple of excerpts and then below those i give you links to two related articles that I think you'll find of value. One is from Dana Milbank at the Washington Post and the other from John Nolte over at Breitbart.
But first, Hinderaker:
Critics almost universally panned Obama’s speech. It was too long, at 54 minutes. It was delivered in a dull, even defeatist style. It contained nothing new–neither new themes nor new policy proposals. It exhibited the whiny, blame-everyone-in-sight quality that has long been putting off voters. And, despite Obama’s endless talk about offering voters a clear choice, he continued to be strangely vague about what he actually wants to do if he gets a second term…
This is revisionist history. There was no “stalemate” in 2009 or 2010; the Democrats controlled all the levers of government. Barack Obama issued any executive orders that he deemed appropriate, and Congress passed all legislation on which Democrats could agree. Republicans had no ability to block Democrat-sponsored measures. So the Democrats passed the $850 billion stimulus, vastly increased discretionary spending, adopted Obamacare, and did anything else they pleased. That wasn’t “stalemate,” it was unfettered Democratic dominance.
But the Democrats’ policies turned out to be catastrophic failures. The stimulus failed to either hold down unemployment, which increased substantially, or to promote growth, which remained anemic. Obamacare proved immediately unpopular and placed heavy burdens on hiring by small businesses, thereby increasing the unemployment rate. The Democrats’ skyrocketing discretionary spending, stimulus and otherwise, was widely judged to be wasted. Its only tangible effect was to cause the national debt to grow three times faster than at any time in our history.
Americans were horrified by the results of the Obama administration’s policies in 2009 and 2010. Therefore, they turned out in November 2010 to stop the Democrats from more such follies. The Republicans, fueled by the Tea Party movement, took the House. Since 2011, there has, therefore, been some constraint on the Democrats’ ability to weaken the economy through massive increases in spending and debt. If this is “stalemate,” it is exactly what the voters chose in 2010...
* Milbank's article, "Skip the falsehoods, Mr. President, and give us a plan."
* Nolte's article, "Obama Speech 'Widely Panned' by Political Press Corps."
Thursday, June 14, 2012
"When Swing Was King" Update -- A Very Special Dance
Claire and I were at Lindenwood yesterday for our regular "When Swing Was King" presentation. It is one of our favorite places but it does have its challenges. The elevator takes forever, the third floor room is pretty small, and we have to tape up black plastic "curtains" that Claire made in order to
make it dark enough to see the images we project on the screen. But a livelier, more interactive, more appreciative group you just won't find. Yesterday we managed to squeeze into that room Claire and I, our equipment, the Activities Director, Ann...and 21 residents.
In fact, we even had enough room for Lyle and Anna to get up and dance together during one of our final songs! Sure, they blocked the screen from view but that didn't matter. We had all heard of Lyle's reputation as a dancer in the days before the unsteadiness, the use of the walker, the falls...and we had seen hints of his grace even in the moves he makes from his chair. But to be surprised by he and Anna (also into her seventies or more) getting up to actually dance together...well, it was an incredible moment.
Yes, we were a bit nervous and we were praying for their strength to hold out. And yes, Ann was very near to provide support if either of the dancers began to weaken or stumble. But they were fine. Anna wore a sweet smile throughout and Lyle was winking at Claire as if to say, "See. I told you I was a dancer." And as they sat down amid uproarious applause, we all knew we had been part of a very wonderful experience.
I told the crowd, "You know, we do these programs at 10 other places every month and I'm wondering if we shouldn't start stopping by here first and pick up Lyle and Anna to provide some special entertainment to go along with the music. What do you guys think?" The applause started all over again and our two dancers beamed with pride.
Lord, thank you so much for that treasure.
And, of course, you are invited to come along with Claire and I and enjoy these kinds of magic moments with us as we take "When Swing Was King" to nursing homes and assisted living facilities throughout the area. You'll love the music and pictures but, more important, you'll be on hand to make the program even more of a "happening" for the residents. Your help in visiting with them before and after (even during) the program would be an important blessing to them...and to you too.
This afternoon we will be presenting "When Swing Was King" out at the Life Care Center in Elkhorn and tomorrow afternoon at Pacific Springs but the monthly schedule can always be found at the Vital Signs Ministries website. Come on along; we would all love the pleasure of your company.
In fact, we even had enough room for Lyle and Anna to get up and dance together during one of our final songs! Sure, they blocked the screen from view but that didn't matter. We had all heard of Lyle's reputation as a dancer in the days before the unsteadiness, the use of the walker, the falls...and we had seen hints of his grace even in the moves he makes from his chair. But to be surprised by he and Anna (also into her seventies or more) getting up to actually dance together...well, it was an incredible moment.
Yes, we were a bit nervous and we were praying for their strength to hold out. And yes, Ann was very near to provide support if either of the dancers began to weaken or stumble. But they were fine. Anna wore a sweet smile throughout and Lyle was winking at Claire as if to say, "See. I told you I was a dancer." And as they sat down amid uproarious applause, we all knew we had been part of a very wonderful experience.
I told the crowd, "You know, we do these programs at 10 other places every month and I'm wondering if we shouldn't start stopping by here first and pick up Lyle and Anna to provide some special entertainment to go along with the music. What do you guys think?" The applause started all over again and our two dancers beamed with pride.
Lord, thank you so much for that treasure.
And, of course, you are invited to come along with Claire and I and enjoy these kinds of magic moments with us as we take "When Swing Was King" to nursing homes and assisted living facilities throughout the area. You'll love the music and pictures but, more important, you'll be on hand to make the program even more of a "happening" for the residents. Your help in visiting with them before and after (even during) the program would be an important blessing to them...and to you too.
This afternoon we will be presenting "When Swing Was King" out at the Life Care Center in Elkhorn and tomorrow afternoon at Pacific Springs but the monthly schedule can always be found at the Vital Signs Ministries website. Come on along; we would all love the pleasure of your company.
Reality Therapy: The Newhart Approach
Finally, someone who shares my kind of "counseling technique."
Imagine how better off the world would be if only Dr. Newhart's approach here was substituted for the flim-flam blame game that recent generations have embraced.
Imagine how better off the world would be if only Dr. Newhart's approach here was substituted for the flim-flam blame game that recent generations have embraced.
Topics:
Culture,
Nanny State,
On the Lighter Side
The Pinocchio President
Over at Power Line, John Hinderaker tries to keep abreast of the Obama administration scandals. And, because the President has given us so doggone many, that's no easy task.
Topics:
Hall of Shame,
National Politics
Here's News That the "Evening News" Strictly Avoided
Among the news items from the last few days that you might have missed -- but shouldn't -- are these:
* After 18 months of complete (and grossly irresponsible) silence from NBC on the Fast and Furious scandal, the network's evening news finally gives it 30 seconds. Uh huh; just 30 seconds. And they managed to even mess that up.
* The Communist thugs who are in charge of Cuba (God help the people there) are stepping up their campaign of repression, including the arrests of dissidents who testified about Cuba's severe human rights abuses before the U.S. Senate last week.
* The number of "donor eggs" (those eggs which are "harvested" from surrogate women and sold to other people who are attempting in vitro fertilization methods to have children) has doubled in the last ten years. Of course, the number of babies thus conceived who then died through IVF procedures are incalculable.
* Will California end by sliding into the Pacific Ocean? Or because Governor Jerry Brown and the Democrats refused to recognize fiscal realities, will the state just fade away into the murky waters of debt, business flight, and infrastructure failure? This excellent article in Forbes shows the sad situation there.
* Speaking of financial failure, the government of the USA "posted a budget deficit of $125 billion in May, more than twice the level registered in the same month last year."
* In this much-needed reality-check article, Ramesh Ponnuru corrects the 6 major myths about the Wisconsin recall election last week -- six myths that have been spouted over and over again by the mainstream press.
* After 18 months of complete (and grossly irresponsible) silence from NBC on the Fast and Furious scandal, the network's evening news finally gives it 30 seconds. Uh huh; just 30 seconds. And they managed to even mess that up.
* The Communist thugs who are in charge of Cuba (God help the people there) are stepping up their campaign of repression, including the arrests of dissidents who testified about Cuba's severe human rights abuses before the U.S. Senate last week.
* The number of "donor eggs" (those eggs which are "harvested" from surrogate women and sold to other people who are attempting in vitro fertilization methods to have children) has doubled in the last ten years. Of course, the number of babies thus conceived who then died through IVF procedures are incalculable.
* Will California end by sliding into the Pacific Ocean? Or because Governor Jerry Brown and the Democrats refused to recognize fiscal realities, will the state just fade away into the murky waters of debt, business flight, and infrastructure failure? This excellent article in Forbes shows the sad situation there.
* Speaking of financial failure, the government of the USA "posted a budget deficit of $125 billion in May, more than twice the level registered in the same month last year."
* In this much-needed reality-check article, Ramesh Ponnuru corrects the 6 major myths about the Wisconsin recall election last week -- six myths that have been spouted over and over again by the mainstream press.
The Sexual Revolution is the REAL War on Women
I print below a couple of paragraphs from Tom Bethell's latest article over at American Spectator. It's called, "From ‘Happily Ever After’ to the Fall: The Costs of the Women's Movement and the Sexual Revolution are Coming Due."
It's really a good one. So don't miss it…and don't let your daughters miss it either.
...A hundred years ago, early feminists opposed abortion. Today? NOW favors “reproductive rights,” to use the latest euphemism. But what so many of us have forgotten is that the old Christian prohibitions against divorce, contraception, and abortion worked to protect women (just as the old injunction against women in combat worked to their advantage, too).
The Cumulative effect has been to plunge us ever deeper into the sexual revolution. There’s a brave pretense that sexual equality is an achievable goal, and not just equality in the office. So we have same-sex college dorms and a culture of “hooking up.” We have date-rape codes and an ever-increasing wariness between the sexes of a marriageable age. The connection between sexual intercourse and procreation has been rendered voluntary.
We are so immersed in this that we can hardly see how revolutionary it is...
It's really a good one. So don't miss it…and don't let your daughters miss it either.
...A hundred years ago, early feminists opposed abortion. Today? NOW favors “reproductive rights,” to use the latest euphemism. But what so many of us have forgotten is that the old Christian prohibitions against divorce, contraception, and abortion worked to protect women (just as the old injunction against women in combat worked to their advantage, too).
The Cumulative effect has been to plunge us ever deeper into the sexual revolution. There’s a brave pretense that sexual equality is an achievable goal, and not just equality in the office. So we have same-sex college dorms and a culture of “hooking up.” We have date-rape codes and an ever-increasing wariness between the sexes of a marriageable age. The connection between sexual intercourse and procreation has been rendered voluntary.
We are so immersed in this that we can hardly see how revolutionary it is...
This Just In: The Obama Administration Is Bizarre
It's not just a matter of radical liberalism. Nor is it only rank inefficiency, unprecedented arrogance and lousy connections with both Congress and the American people.
The Barack Obama administration is also weird to the max.
On Monday morning, Washington awoke to learn that Commerce Secretary John Bryson had been involved in a series of auto accidents in southern California on Saturday evening, and cited with a felony hit-and-run by responding police. This news was of course shocking.
For several hours, the White House and the Commerce Department declined comment. In this vacuum, the rumors took a life of their own. Some speculated there was alcohol involved, despite initial police accounts that this was not the case. After official statements reported seizures were the cause of the accidents, the ire turned on that initial speculation, blaming the sardonic culture of Twitter...
Part of the blame surely lay at the feet of an inept White House communications operation, unable to provide the general public with any answers to the health and well-being of a cabinet secretary. This media stonewall continued in Press Secretary Jay Carney’s daily briefing.
In Carney’s first answer, we learned that President Obama had not spoken with Secretary Bryson. This seemed odd. A cabinet secretary is hospitalized following serious traffic incidents and a police citation and the president does not pick up the phone to check on his welfare?
Pressed for details, Carney continually directed questions to the Commerce Department. As if this matter had nothing to do with the White House…
Later that afternoon, the president did a series of local television interviews, in which he was asked about the situation. The president reiterated that he had still not spoken to Secretary Bryson and that he had “just found out about this today.”
Later that evening, at 10 pm, the White House issued a statement declaring that Secretary Bryson was taking a medical leave of absence and that Deputy Secretary Rebecca Blank would serve as Acting Secretary. While White House statements at 10 pm are not absolutely abnormal, they are rare. This fit the mold of the bizarre events of the day.
Let’s be clear, everyone hopes Secretary Bryson is well, recovering and getting the medical attention he needs. Bryson is in the prayers of countless Americans. But the reaction of the White House to this news has made a strange set of circumstances seem odder than likely necessary.
President Obama certainly has an estranged relationship with his cabinet, preferring to govern mostly out of the White House. But according to White House Visitor Logs, John Bryson actually visited more often than many of his colleagues–a total of 31 times (barring multiple John Brysons). Energy Secretary Steven Chu had visited 17 times and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has only swung by 13 times. To put that in context, Democratic consultant Hilary Rosen has visited the White House 33 times and union boss Richard Trumka has visited 69 times…
(Rory Cooper, "The Bizarre White House Reaction to John Bryson News", The Foundry at the Heritage Foundation)
The Barack Obama administration is also weird to the max.
On Monday morning, Washington awoke to learn that Commerce Secretary John Bryson had been involved in a series of auto accidents in southern California on Saturday evening, and cited with a felony hit-and-run by responding police. This news was of course shocking.
For several hours, the White House and the Commerce Department declined comment. In this vacuum, the rumors took a life of their own. Some speculated there was alcohol involved, despite initial police accounts that this was not the case. After official statements reported seizures were the cause of the accidents, the ire turned on that initial speculation, blaming the sardonic culture of Twitter...
Part of the blame surely lay at the feet of an inept White House communications operation, unable to provide the general public with any answers to the health and well-being of a cabinet secretary. This media stonewall continued in Press Secretary Jay Carney’s daily briefing.
In Carney’s first answer, we learned that President Obama had not spoken with Secretary Bryson. This seemed odd. A cabinet secretary is hospitalized following serious traffic incidents and a police citation and the president does not pick up the phone to check on his welfare?
Pressed for details, Carney continually directed questions to the Commerce Department. As if this matter had nothing to do with the White House…
Later that afternoon, the president did a series of local television interviews, in which he was asked about the situation. The president reiterated that he had still not spoken to Secretary Bryson and that he had “just found out about this today.”
Later that evening, at 10 pm, the White House issued a statement declaring that Secretary Bryson was taking a medical leave of absence and that Deputy Secretary Rebecca Blank would serve as Acting Secretary. While White House statements at 10 pm are not absolutely abnormal, they are rare. This fit the mold of the bizarre events of the day.
Let’s be clear, everyone hopes Secretary Bryson is well, recovering and getting the medical attention he needs. Bryson is in the prayers of countless Americans. But the reaction of the White House to this news has made a strange set of circumstances seem odder than likely necessary.
President Obama certainly has an estranged relationship with his cabinet, preferring to govern mostly out of the White House. But according to White House Visitor Logs, John Bryson actually visited more often than many of his colleagues–a total of 31 times (barring multiple John Brysons). Energy Secretary Steven Chu had visited 17 times and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has only swung by 13 times. To put that in context, Democratic consultant Hilary Rosen has visited the White House 33 times and union boss Richard Trumka has visited 69 times…
(Rory Cooper, "The Bizarre White House Reaction to John Bryson News", The Foundry at the Heritage Foundation)
Topics:
Hall of Shame,
National Politics
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Up, Up and Away...Forever
It was a little before six yesterday morning and I was on my way to Panera’s for my regular Tuesday morning routine – prayerfully planning out the week, clearing up correspondence and enjoying an always stimulating conversation with John Malek – when I saw a lonely but lovely hot air balloon hanging just over the southwest horizon. It didn’t seem to be drifting at all; indeed, it held the same position the whole time of my drive and at least several minutes after I got my coffee. But I was then distracted with work and the next time I looked up, maybe 20 minutes later, it was gone.
I wished I had my binoculars with me. I wished too that Claire had seen it – hot air balloons are pretty rare in our part of the country. But I especially wished my sister Sherry could have seen it too because she really likes hot air balloons and still cherishes the dream, as yet unfulfilled, of gliding through the air in this colorful, buoyant style.
In fact, gazing at this hot air balloon made me think of three things and the first directly concerned Sherry. It is a vivid memory of an early morning in the mountains of Colorado sometime back in the late 80’s. The Hartford clan was having one of its very few family reunions. Sherry was there with her family, Mom, Claire and I, Ric and his wife, James, and Linda and her family. We had a wonderful time that week but the highlight of the whole event was Sherry tearing through the place very early one morning (we were all still abed) and yelling at everyone to get up and look out the windows.
I was rather disgruntled at the sudden awakening but since she was so adamant, I stumbled over to the sliding glass door that led out to the balcony, drew open the shades and …wow upon wow…there they were! About two dozen hot air balloons had come over Loveland Pass and were now moving pretty fast down the valley. They were colorful. They were colossal. And they were close! We were awestruck at the beauty, the grace, and the sheer uniqueness of the sight – these huge, silent beasts that carried passengers who were waving to us and wishing us good morning. In various stages of undress, we waved back, feeling a pang of deep regret that we weren’t in one of those baskets with them, sailing through the crisp mountain air to who knows where - Frisco, Leadville, for all we knew, maybe Shangri-La.
Far from being annoyed at Sherry for waking us, we were all extremely grateful to her for giving us this rare and invaluable gift. It was, in one sense, a fleeting moment. The balloons moved so quickly that within minutes they were all gone from sight. But, in another and very real sense, Sherry also gave us a forever moment because the combination of surprise, novelty, color, movement, the soulful longing everyone feels for travel and adventure…and the fact that we experienced it as a family... made that moment something that we will always treasure. I’m feeling a glow just writing about it now.
But the second train of thought elicited by that balloon yesterday morning was a bit more philosophical for it caused me to also think of the song which Americans of my generation invariably link with hot air balloons; namely, the lilting lyrics of Jimmy Webb’s “Up, Up and Away” as delivered by the Fifth Dimension. The song is exquisite – nearly every Webb song is – and the incomparable voices of Marilyn McCoo, Billy Davis, Jr and the rest of the Fifth Dimension almost guaranteed that it would be one of the most popular songs of the 1960’s.
But it’s not just the sound of “Up, Up and Away” that gave it almost anthem status for the flower children. It was the sentiment of the song too – the sentiment of escapism. Sure, love songs and poetry have, throughout the ages, tended towards this theme. “Make the world go away. We’ll build a world of our own. Fly me to the moon.” And so on. But there was a particularly pronounced escapism of the 1960’s youth culture that went beyond romance. For some that involved outright rebellion, the laborious attempt to change what they believed was a restraining status quo. But for many more, the response to the world was just escape. And whether the "drop out" route involved drugs or drink, the intensity of sensual pleasure or immersion in the minutiae of popular entertainment, quadraphonic sound or religious mysticism, the goal was self-absorption.
Many of the Fifth Dimension's songs fit this mood -- “Age of Aquarius,” “Stoned Soul Picnic,” “Paper Cup,” "Sweet Blindness," and, of course, “Up, Up and Away. ” They described the delight of finding a refuge from the harshness of the real world. They weren't songs of rebellion. Those came from harder-edged groups. No, the Fifth Dimension offered a mellow, more sensual route of escape. Make love, not war. Harmony and understanding. Party hearty. Hold a good thought for cosmic convergence.
The lyrics to "Paper Cup" (another Jimmy Webb song, by the way) include these lines:
Here inside my paper cup
Everything is looking up
No one comes in, no one goes out
Nothin' to get hung up about
I'm free and it's so easy to get by
Cause I don't try.
Living ain't so bad without a rudder
Life is kind a groovy in the gutter.
Sound familiar? Forget old-world values like work, the integrity of family and tribe, morality, making something out of yourself, changing the world for the better. Instead, make the hippy mantra your reality -- "Turn on. Tune in. Drop out."
But the lyric that particularly grabbed me yesterday morning was from "Up, Up and Away." It goes, “The world’s a nicer place in my beautiful balloon; it wears a nicer face in my beautiful balloon.”
But the balloon ride doesn't make the world a nicer place. It, in fact, has nothing to do with the world. It's soaring above it, unconnected, uninvolved. And from the balloon one isn't even an effective observer. The spectacle is too distant. The aerial view doesn’t take in the broken-hearted young girl in her bedroom, the angry young thug in the prison cell, the fatherless child in the alley, the lonely widow leafing through the photo album, the worried mother in the doctor's waiting room. No, the scene from the balloon takes in only color and general contour. Hidden from sight is the trash and tragedy of real life. That, no doubt, suggests a world with a "nicer face." But it’s not the real world at all.
And, of course, even the exhilarating experience of flying through the air must end. Alas, there is a limit for that beautiful balloon. It does go up and up...but it doesn't really go away. It must, governed as it is by a law of gravity that no amount of yearning can deny, come down to earth. The balloon ride doesn't make an efficient refuge from reality at all. A respite, yes. But not a refuge. For when the balloon inevitably returns, the passengers find themselves once again on the cold, cruel earth, facing all the problems, questions, and challenges they left behind.
But I'm not ending this essay on that note. Oh, no. For there was one more area of thought that the sight of that hot air balloon opened for me yesterday. And it also brought back to me the lyrics of a song, one that I knew long before I heard of the Fifth Dimension...though I must admit I didn't treasure the meaning of those lyrics until it was almost too late.
This song was written in 1929 by Oklahoma musician and hymn writer Albert E. Brumley. And it's lyrics not only describe the "final flight" of the Christian, one who has personally trusted the sacrifice Jesus made to pay for the sins of mankind, they also provide the secret to living joyfully and victoriously on the cold, cruel earth I've mentioned earlier. For though we must face the challenges the real world presents (no escape until our day is done), we do so in the confident expectation that a "nicer world" does exist for the believer in Christ. It is the "new heavens and new earth" prepared expressly for us by Jesus Himself.
The song, as some of you have already guessed, is the most recorded gospel song ever, "I'll Fly Away."
Some glad morning when this life is o'er,
I'll fly away;
To a home on God's celestial shore,
I'll fly away.
I'll fly away, Oh glory
I'll fly away.
When I die, Hallelujah, by and by,
I'll fly away.
When the shadows of this life have gone,
I'll fly away;
Like a bird from prison bars has flown,
I'll fly away.
Just a few more weary days and then,
I'll fly away;
To a land where joy shall never end,
I'll fly away.
The hot air balloons Sherry awakened to us that Colorado morning were spectacular and I'll never forget the sight of them floating down the valley with the blue of the Rocky Mountains behind them. Nor will I forget the yearning they created in my soul for spiritual flight. But the trip I now have scheduled is not a disconnected, day-trip escape like the one the Fifth Dimension invited me on. I want the real thing. The lasting thing. The final flight that doesn't just take me "up, up and away" but instead takes me to God's celestial shore. Boy, I'm looking forward to it.
By the way, have you booked your flight yet?
I wished I had my binoculars with me. I wished too that Claire had seen it – hot air balloons are pretty rare in our part of the country. But I especially wished my sister Sherry could have seen it too because she really likes hot air balloons and still cherishes the dream, as yet unfulfilled, of gliding through the air in this colorful, buoyant style.
In fact, gazing at this hot air balloon made me think of three things and the first directly concerned Sherry. It is a vivid memory of an early morning in the mountains of Colorado sometime back in the late 80’s. The Hartford clan was having one of its very few family reunions. Sherry was there with her family, Mom, Claire and I, Ric and his wife, James, and Linda and her family. We had a wonderful time that week but the highlight of the whole event was Sherry tearing through the place very early one morning (we were all still abed) and yelling at everyone to get up and look out the windows.
I was rather disgruntled at the sudden awakening but since she was so adamant, I stumbled over to the sliding glass door that led out to the balcony, drew open the shades and …wow upon wow…there they were! About two dozen hot air balloons had come over Loveland Pass and were now moving pretty fast down the valley. They were colorful. They were colossal. And they were close! We were awestruck at the beauty, the grace, and the sheer uniqueness of the sight – these huge, silent beasts that carried passengers who were waving to us and wishing us good morning. In various stages of undress, we waved back, feeling a pang of deep regret that we weren’t in one of those baskets with them, sailing through the crisp mountain air to who knows where - Frisco, Leadville, for all we knew, maybe Shangri-La.
Far from being annoyed at Sherry for waking us, we were all extremely grateful to her for giving us this rare and invaluable gift. It was, in one sense, a fleeting moment. The balloons moved so quickly that within minutes they were all gone from sight. But, in another and very real sense, Sherry also gave us a forever moment because the combination of surprise, novelty, color, movement, the soulful longing everyone feels for travel and adventure…and the fact that we experienced it as a family... made that moment something that we will always treasure. I’m feeling a glow just writing about it now.
But the second train of thought elicited by that balloon yesterday morning was a bit more philosophical for it caused me to also think of the song which Americans of my generation invariably link with hot air balloons; namely, the lilting lyrics of Jimmy Webb’s “Up, Up and Away” as delivered by the Fifth Dimension. The song is exquisite – nearly every Webb song is – and the incomparable voices of Marilyn McCoo, Billy Davis, Jr and the rest of the Fifth Dimension almost guaranteed that it would be one of the most popular songs of the 1960’s.
But it’s not just the sound of “Up, Up and Away” that gave it almost anthem status for the flower children. It was the sentiment of the song too – the sentiment of escapism. Sure, love songs and poetry have, throughout the ages, tended towards this theme. “Make the world go away. We’ll build a world of our own. Fly me to the moon.” And so on. But there was a particularly pronounced escapism of the 1960’s youth culture that went beyond romance. For some that involved outright rebellion, the laborious attempt to change what they believed was a restraining status quo. But for many more, the response to the world was just escape. And whether the "drop out" route involved drugs or drink, the intensity of sensual pleasure or immersion in the minutiae of popular entertainment, quadraphonic sound or religious mysticism, the goal was self-absorption.
Many of the Fifth Dimension's songs fit this mood -- “Age of Aquarius,” “Stoned Soul Picnic,” “Paper Cup,” "Sweet Blindness," and, of course, “Up, Up and Away. ” They described the delight of finding a refuge from the harshness of the real world. They weren't songs of rebellion. Those came from harder-edged groups. No, the Fifth Dimension offered a mellow, more sensual route of escape. Make love, not war. Harmony and understanding. Party hearty. Hold a good thought for cosmic convergence.
The lyrics to "Paper Cup" (another Jimmy Webb song, by the way) include these lines:
Here inside my paper cup
Everything is looking up
No one comes in, no one goes out
Nothin' to get hung up about
I'm free and it's so easy to get by
Cause I don't try.
Living ain't so bad without a rudder
Life is kind a groovy in the gutter.
Sound familiar? Forget old-world values like work, the integrity of family and tribe, morality, making something out of yourself, changing the world for the better. Instead, make the hippy mantra your reality -- "Turn on. Tune in. Drop out."
But the lyric that particularly grabbed me yesterday morning was from "Up, Up and Away." It goes, “The world’s a nicer place in my beautiful balloon; it wears a nicer face in my beautiful balloon.”
But the balloon ride doesn't make the world a nicer place. It, in fact, has nothing to do with the world. It's soaring above it, unconnected, uninvolved. And from the balloon one isn't even an effective observer. The spectacle is too distant. The aerial view doesn’t take in the broken-hearted young girl in her bedroom, the angry young thug in the prison cell, the fatherless child in the alley, the lonely widow leafing through the photo album, the worried mother in the doctor's waiting room. No, the scene from the balloon takes in only color and general contour. Hidden from sight is the trash and tragedy of real life. That, no doubt, suggests a world with a "nicer face." But it’s not the real world at all.
And, of course, even the exhilarating experience of flying through the air must end. Alas, there is a limit for that beautiful balloon. It does go up and up...but it doesn't really go away. It must, governed as it is by a law of gravity that no amount of yearning can deny, come down to earth. The balloon ride doesn't make an efficient refuge from reality at all. A respite, yes. But not a refuge. For when the balloon inevitably returns, the passengers find themselves once again on the cold, cruel earth, facing all the problems, questions, and challenges they left behind.
But I'm not ending this essay on that note. Oh, no. For there was one more area of thought that the sight of that hot air balloon opened for me yesterday. And it also brought back to me the lyrics of a song, one that I knew long before I heard of the Fifth Dimension...though I must admit I didn't treasure the meaning of those lyrics until it was almost too late.
This song was written in 1929 by Oklahoma musician and hymn writer Albert E. Brumley. And it's lyrics not only describe the "final flight" of the Christian, one who has personally trusted the sacrifice Jesus made to pay for the sins of mankind, they also provide the secret to living joyfully and victoriously on the cold, cruel earth I've mentioned earlier. For though we must face the challenges the real world presents (no escape until our day is done), we do so in the confident expectation that a "nicer world" does exist for the believer in Christ. It is the "new heavens and new earth" prepared expressly for us by Jesus Himself.
The song, as some of you have already guessed, is the most recorded gospel song ever, "I'll Fly Away."
Some glad morning when this life is o'er,
I'll fly away;
To a home on God's celestial shore,
I'll fly away.
I'll fly away, Oh glory
I'll fly away.
When I die, Hallelujah, by and by,
I'll fly away.
When the shadows of this life have gone,
I'll fly away;
Like a bird from prison bars has flown,
I'll fly away.
Just a few more weary days and then,
I'll fly away;
To a land where joy shall never end,
I'll fly away.
The hot air balloons Sherry awakened to us that Colorado morning were spectacular and I'll never forget the sight of them floating down the valley with the blue of the Rocky Mountains behind them. Nor will I forget the yearning they created in my soul for spiritual flight. But the trip I now have scheduled is not a disconnected, day-trip escape like the one the Fifth Dimension invited me on. I want the real thing. The lasting thing. The final flight that doesn't just take me "up, up and away" but instead takes me to God's celestial shore. Boy, I'm looking forward to it.
By the way, have you booked your flight yet?
Topics:
Christian Teaching,
Culture,
Personal Affairs
This World Is Not Our Home
“This world is not my home,
I'm just a passing through.
My treasures are laid up
Somewhere beyond the blue.
The angels beckon me
From heaven's open door
And I can't feel at home
In this world anymore.”
Some of you remember those profound lyrics. They’re taken from a bluegrass gospel song that’s been around for at least a century. But even if the lines are unfamiliar to you, I trust that the philosophy they proclaim is not. After all, it is a thoroughly biblical perspective, one that recognizes that the Christian is an alien and stranger in this cosmos, a spiritual sojourner whose primary purposes are to invest in heavenly values and to remain unstained by the world...
Why not read the rest of the June LifeSharer letter, the monthly correspondence from Vital Signs Ministries? You'll find it on page one of the VSM website right here.
I'm just a passing through.
My treasures are laid up
Somewhere beyond the blue.
The angels beckon me
From heaven's open door
And I can't feel at home
In this world anymore.”
Some of you remember those profound lyrics. They’re taken from a bluegrass gospel song that’s been around for at least a century. But even if the lines are unfamiliar to you, I trust that the philosophy they proclaim is not. After all, it is a thoroughly biblical perspective, one that recognizes that the Christian is an alien and stranger in this cosmos, a spiritual sojourner whose primary purposes are to invest in heavenly values and to remain unstained by the world...
Why not read the rest of the June LifeSharer letter, the monthly correspondence from Vital Signs Ministries? You'll find it on page one of the VSM website right here.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
It's Not Just the Commerce Secretary That's Crashed
It has been a Junius Horribilis for President Obama.
Job growth has stalled, the Democrats have been humiliated in Wisconsin, the attorney general is facing a contempt-of-Congress citation, talks with Pakistan have broken down, Bill Clinton is contradicting Obama, Mitt Romney is outraising him, Democrats and Republicans alike are complaining about a “cascade” of national-security leaks from his administration, and he is now on record as saying that the “private sector is doing fine.”
Could it get any worse?
Early Monday morning, Obama learned that it could. His aides delivered the news to him that his commerce secretary had been cited for a felony hit-and-run after allegedly crashing his car three times over the weekend…
For the White House, it was just the latest entry in the when-it-rains-it-pours ledger. This has been one of the worst stretches of the Obama presidency. In Washington, there is a creeping sense that the bottom has fallen out and that there may be no second term. Privately, senior Obama advisers say they are no longer expecting much economic improvement before the election...
The whole Washington Post story (writer Dana Milbank) really deserves to be read. So...here it is.
Also, check out this related story (written by S.A. Miller) over at the New York Post.
Job growth has stalled, the Democrats have been humiliated in Wisconsin, the attorney general is facing a contempt-of-Congress citation, talks with Pakistan have broken down, Bill Clinton is contradicting Obama, Mitt Romney is outraising him, Democrats and Republicans alike are complaining about a “cascade” of national-security leaks from his administration, and he is now on record as saying that the “private sector is doing fine.”
Could it get any worse?
Early Monday morning, Obama learned that it could. His aides delivered the news to him that his commerce secretary had been cited for a felony hit-and-run after allegedly crashing his car three times over the weekend…
For the White House, it was just the latest entry in the when-it-rains-it-pours ledger. This has been one of the worst stretches of the Obama presidency. In Washington, there is a creeping sense that the bottom has fallen out and that there may be no second term. Privately, senior Obama advisers say they are no longer expecting much economic improvement before the election...
The whole Washington Post story (writer Dana Milbank) really deserves to be read. So...here it is.
Also, check out this related story (written by S.A. Miller) over at the New York Post.
Topics:
Media Matters,
National Politics
Abortion Clinic Workers, Look Out for Your Employer
So, maybe you are currently [an abortion] clinic worker. Maybe you are aware of fraudulent activity taking place at your facility. Maybe it is happening and you don’t even know about it. We just recently saw videos exposed by Live Action that show clinic workers knowingly breaking the law. Has that been you? Can you really trust your employer, the abortion industry? This is the same industry that has multiple lawsuits pending (all brought on by former clinic workers) that allege fraud. This is the same industry that is currently under Congressional investigation because of suspected misdeeds. This is the same industry that has been caught again and again by Live Action and other groups breaking the law and deliberately lying to patients.
These are the people you trust? You think they are loyal to you? Think again. Just months before I left Planned Parenthood, I had received their “Employee of the Year” award. Three weeks after I left, I was sitting in a court fighting against the people I once called my closest friends. You’ve heard the saying, “There is no honor among thieves.” Well, there is even less honor in the abortion industry.
Read right here the full text of Abby Johnson's open letter to Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinic employees.
These are the people you trust? You think they are loyal to you? Think again. Just months before I left Planned Parenthood, I had received their “Employee of the Year” award. Three weeks after I left, I was sitting in a court fighting against the people I once called my closest friends. You’ve heard the saying, “There is no honor among thieves.” Well, there is even less honor in the abortion industry.
Read right here the full text of Abby Johnson's open letter to Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinic employees.
Nanny State Report: Another Doctor Hangs Up His Stethoscope
Friends in Colorado alerted me to this open letter from a physician in Summit County (Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco) who has decided to stop fighting the ever-encroaching regulations and inequities of the Nanny State and hang up his stethoscope.
As some of you know, this is already happening with some frequency. And even if we get some relief from the Supreme Court regarding ObamaCare, the practices already established by a manipulative government, a government that cares far more for securing its own power in the medical field than it does for quality patient care, effective procedures and cost containment, will force many more doctors to join the exodus.
Where will that leave you and your family? Probably consulting Aunt Getrude's list of home remedies.
Good luck with that.
As some of you know, this is already happening with some frequency. And even if we get some relief from the Supreme Court regarding ObamaCare, the practices already established by a manipulative government, a government that cares far more for securing its own power in the medical field than it does for quality patient care, effective procedures and cost containment, will force many more doctors to join the exodus.
Where will that leave you and your family? Probably consulting Aunt Getrude's list of home remedies.
Good luck with that.
Elementary School Principle Bans Patriotic Song, Allows Pop Idol's Love Song
Guys, this is how ludicrous it's getting in the government school system. An elementary school principal in New York has decided that the kindergartners at PS 90 in Coney Island cannot sing "God Bless the USA" at the final school program because…wait for it…the principle believes the song could "offend other cultures."
Right. It's a school in the United States of America which is paid for from the taxes of citizens of the United States of America -- and yet the principle thinks a patriotic song is offensive. Does she know nothing of our history? Is she so clueless about the "melting pot" and the political ideals which America, almost unique in the world, represents? Is she truly so ignorant as to believe that patriotism denies pride of ethnicity?
Heavens to Betsy; what an outrageous act of stupidity, arrogance and sheer meanness.
Oh, by the way, the principle also stated that "God Bless the USA" is "too grown-up" for five-year-olds to sing. But she's just fine with them performing Justin Bieber's song "Baby," a few of the lyrics of which I print below.
Are we an item? Girl, quit playing
We're just friends, what are you saying?...
And I'm in pieces, baby fix me
And just shake me 'til you wake me from this bad dream
I'm going down, down, down, down
And I just can't believe my first love won't be around...
Baby, baby, baby oooh
Like baby, baby, baby nooo
Like baby, baby, baby oooh.
Here's more on this outrage. And in a related article, Ken Blackwell asks (and answers) the question, "Is the Star Spangled Banner An 'Abomination'"?
Right. It's a school in the United States of America which is paid for from the taxes of citizens of the United States of America -- and yet the principle thinks a patriotic song is offensive. Does she know nothing of our history? Is she so clueless about the "melting pot" and the political ideals which America, almost unique in the world, represents? Is she truly so ignorant as to believe that patriotism denies pride of ethnicity?
Heavens to Betsy; what an outrageous act of stupidity, arrogance and sheer meanness.
Oh, by the way, the principle also stated that "God Bless the USA" is "too grown-up" for five-year-olds to sing. But she's just fine with them performing Justin Bieber's song "Baby," a few of the lyrics of which I print below.
Are we an item? Girl, quit playing
We're just friends, what are you saying?...
And I'm in pieces, baby fix me
And just shake me 'til you wake me from this bad dream
I'm going down, down, down, down
And I just can't believe my first love won't be around...
Baby, baby, baby oooh
Like baby, baby, baby nooo
Like baby, baby, baby oooh.
Here's more on this outrage. And in a related article, Ken Blackwell asks (and answers) the question, "Is the Star Spangled Banner An 'Abomination'"?
Topics:
Culture Wars,
Education,
Freedom Issues,
Hall of Shame,
Nanny State
Breaking the Power of "Public" Unions
I keep trying to convince Jack Niewold, author of Frail Web of Intention, to start a blog so that the wise and relevant essays he writes would be 1) available to more readers, 2) easier to find, 3) easier to link to, and 4) better stored for future reference. This excellent commentary is just one example of why I'll keep hounding him to start that blog. Read it and you'll agree.
What about public employee unions? When my kids were in public schools in Oakland, CA, I would occasionally ask a teacher: Why are you unionized? I would get an uncomprehending look similar to the one I once got when I asked a CPA why she agreed with a progressive income tax. It was like: Huh? Don't you know that's the way it's supposed to be? They'd mutter something about bad administrators, but I never got real answers from either the teachers or the CPA, and to this day I believe most public employees simply assume that the world at its creation mandated that they belong to unions.
We will ignore for the moment the nasty reality that in public employee unions, the unions sit on both sides of the bargaining table. Because of the amount of money they spend to elect union-friendly politicians, they end up in a symbiotic relationship with the very officials they once considered adversaries. They assure the election of those who in turn assure their benefits, and so the world turns.
A closed system of this kind can only be broken into from the outside. There is neither the desire nor the ability to change it from within. It has lost any reference to overarching social realities. It is a self-perpetuating cycle that is oblivious to any argument or evidence. This helps to explain the bitter polarization in the Wisconsin fight.
And, unfortunately, it will be this kind of house-to-house, hand-to-hand fight to change the direction of the country. But it has to happen, because the people of America simply will not go on paying their public servants more than they themselves ever hope to make.
What about public employee unions? When my kids were in public schools in Oakland, CA, I would occasionally ask a teacher: Why are you unionized? I would get an uncomprehending look similar to the one I once got when I asked a CPA why she agreed with a progressive income tax. It was like: Huh? Don't you know that's the way it's supposed to be? They'd mutter something about bad administrators, but I never got real answers from either the teachers or the CPA, and to this day I believe most public employees simply assume that the world at its creation mandated that they belong to unions.
We will ignore for the moment the nasty reality that in public employee unions, the unions sit on both sides of the bargaining table. Because of the amount of money they spend to elect union-friendly politicians, they end up in a symbiotic relationship with the very officials they once considered adversaries. They assure the election of those who in turn assure their benefits, and so the world turns.
A closed system of this kind can only be broken into from the outside. There is neither the desire nor the ability to change it from within. It has lost any reference to overarching social realities. It is a self-perpetuating cycle that is oblivious to any argument or evidence. This helps to explain the bitter polarization in the Wisconsin fight.
And, unfortunately, it will be this kind of house-to-house, hand-to-hand fight to change the direction of the country. But it has to happen, because the people of America simply will not go on paying their public servants more than they themselves ever hope to make.
Friday, June 08, 2012
Food for Thought (And Action)
We're headed out to get the LifeSharer letter printed and then to our afternoon presentation of "When Swing Was King" over at Immanuel Courtyard. But before zipping out to the car, as my last act of blogging today, let me list a few items to consider for your weekend reading.
* "Can Ireland save civilization again?" by Sheila Liaugminas over at Mercator.
* "Sci Fi Giant Ray Bradbury Slams Obama’s Era of Big Government" by Warner Todd Huston.
* "America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President" -- a dramatic and seemingly unending list of Barack Obama's track record compiled by Concerned Women for America.
* "Dr. James Dobson insists he will not ‘bow before’ Obama’s ‘wicked’ abortion mandate" by Angela O'Brien
* "When Will the President Reveal a Secret Deal with the Russians?" by Michaela Bendikova at the Heritage Foundation.
* "Five Lessons America Can Learn From The Failures Of Other Nation-States" by John Hawkins.
* "Can Ireland save civilization again?" by Sheila Liaugminas over at Mercator.
* "Sci Fi Giant Ray Bradbury Slams Obama’s Era of Big Government" by Warner Todd Huston.
* "America’s Most Biblically-Hostile U. S. President" -- a dramatic and seemingly unending list of Barack Obama's track record compiled by Concerned Women for America.
* "Dr. James Dobson insists he will not ‘bow before’ Obama’s ‘wicked’ abortion mandate" by Angela O'Brien
* "When Will the President Reveal a Secret Deal with the Russians?" by Michaela Bendikova at the Heritage Foundation.
* "Five Lessons America Can Learn From The Failures Of Other Nation-States" by John Hawkins.
TV's Most Iconic Characters? Denny & Claire's Picks.
The other night Claire and I tried to come up with our Top Ten iconic characters from television. Note -- I said "characters," not mere personalities or actors. Thus, we left out "real" folks who we would certainly consider bigger than life from our TV watching like Ed Sullivan, Dick Clark, Johnny Carson, Emeril Lagasse or Howard Cosell.
It sure wasn't easy and we admit from the start here that we concentrated on icons that we liked -- not simply the most popular or influential. For instance, Fonzie didn't make our list nor did Archie Bunker, J.R. Ewing or anyone from M.A.S.H. We realize they would probably make America's Top Ten but we're not America. We didn't care for them and so they weren't even in the running.
The second admission is that we're not much into TV. We were when we were kids though and so most of our list comes from the 50s and 60s. The third admission is that we sometimes counted pairs of characters (even groups) as a single entry. And the final admission? We couldn't keep it within ten!
So, with all that said, here (listed in reverse order of preference) is Denny & Claire's Top Ten TV Iconic Characters with a second list of thirteen more (in no particular order) which made Honorable Mention.
The Top Ten:
10) Paladin
9) Mission Impossible team
8) Ward, June, Wally and Beaver Cleaver
7) Batman & Robin
6) John Steed & Emma Peel
5) Joe Friday
4) Superman
3) The Lone Ranger & Tonto
2) Andy Taylor, Barney Fife and Opie Taylor
1) Lt. Columbo
And the Honorable Mentions:
* Lucas McCain.
* Jessica Fletcher
* Laverne & Shirley & Lenny & Squiggy
* Maxwell Smart
* Ralph Kramden & Ed Norton
* Howdy Doody, Buffalo Bob & Clarabelle
* Matt Dillon
* Rocky & Bullwinkle
* Richard Kimble
* The Cartwrights
* Napoleon Solo & Illya Kuryakin
* Steve McGarrett
* Lassie
It sure wasn't easy and we admit from the start here that we concentrated on icons that we liked -- not simply the most popular or influential. For instance, Fonzie didn't make our list nor did Archie Bunker, J.R. Ewing or anyone from M.A.S.H. We realize they would probably make America's Top Ten but we're not America. We didn't care for them and so they weren't even in the running.
The second admission is that we're not much into TV. We were when we were kids though and so most of our list comes from the 50s and 60s. The third admission is that we sometimes counted pairs of characters (even groups) as a single entry. And the final admission? We couldn't keep it within ten!
So, with all that said, here (listed in reverse order of preference) is Denny & Claire's Top Ten TV Iconic Characters with a second list of thirteen more (in no particular order) which made Honorable Mention.
The Top Ten:
10) Paladin
9) Mission Impossible team
8) Ward, June, Wally and Beaver Cleaver
7) Batman & Robin
6) John Steed & Emma Peel
5) Joe Friday
4) Superman
3) The Lone Ranger & Tonto
2) Andy Taylor, Barney Fife and Opie Taylor
1) Lt. Columbo
And the Honorable Mentions:
* Lucas McCain.
* Jessica Fletcher
* Laverne & Shirley & Lenny & Squiggy
* Maxwell Smart
* Ralph Kramden & Ed Norton
* Howdy Doody, Buffalo Bob & Clarabelle
* Matt Dillon
* Rocky & Bullwinkle
* Richard Kimble
* The Cartwrights
* Napoleon Solo & Illya Kuryakin
* Steve McGarrett
* Lassie
Topics:
Culture,
History,
On the Lighter Side,
Personal Affairs,
The Arts
Obama, Holder Fight to Keep Dead People on the Voter Lists
Barack Obama and Eric Holder want to keep dead people on the voting registration lists. And they're willing to use the coercive powers of the federal government to get their way -- even if they're breaking the law in the process.
Sound crazy?
Here's Hans von Spakovsky over at National Review with the latest on this alarming story.
Sound crazy?
Here's Hans von Spakovsky over at National Review with the latest on this alarming story.
Topics:
Crime,
Culture Wars,
Freedom Issues,
Hall of Shame,
Nanny State,
National Politics
NY Daily News Angry Over Obama's "Selected" Leaks
The New York Daily News, the nation's fourth largest circulation newspaper, is bothered (and rightly so) about the White House leaking large amounts of America's important secrets while making sure that other matters which should be made public are held back.
But for Team Obama, politics trumps national security every time.
Here's a few excerpts from the newspaper's editorial, "The Obama administration is keeping open secrets."
On the one hand, the Obama administration, citing national security, asserts that the American public has little right to know anything, even after the fact, about a drone campaign that has killed many Al Qaeda terrorists.
On the other hand, the administration has turned into a veritable sieve on a range of sensitive national security matters…
The selectivity — or, less charitably, hypocrisy — must stop...
Serious questions have even been raised about whether movie producers were given exclusive and inappropriate access to information about the Osama Bin Laden kill.
What makes these disclosures especially glaring: The administration has been particularly vigorous in prosecuting leaks — bringing six cases under the Espionage Act alone, part of what expert Gabriel Schoenfeld calls “the most draconian crackdown on leaks in our history — even more so than Nixon.”
There is a strange disconnect between the fervor of these efforts and the enthusiasm of high-level disclosures.
On Wednesday, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, expressed what has become a common frustration on Capitol Hill:
“What we’re seeing is . . . an avalanche of leaks. And it’s very, very disturbing. You know, it’s dismayed our allies. It puts American lives in jeopardy. It puts our nation’s security in jeopardy.”
But for Team Obama, politics trumps national security every time.
Here's a few excerpts from the newspaper's editorial, "The Obama administration is keeping open secrets."
On the one hand, the Obama administration, citing national security, asserts that the American public has little right to know anything, even after the fact, about a drone campaign that has killed many Al Qaeda terrorists.
On the other hand, the administration has turned into a veritable sieve on a range of sensitive national security matters…
The selectivity — or, less charitably, hypocrisy — must stop...
Serious questions have even been raised about whether movie producers were given exclusive and inappropriate access to information about the Osama Bin Laden kill.
What makes these disclosures especially glaring: The administration has been particularly vigorous in prosecuting leaks — bringing six cases under the Espionage Act alone, part of what expert Gabriel Schoenfeld calls “the most draconian crackdown on leaks in our history — even more so than Nixon.”
There is a strange disconnect between the fervor of these efforts and the enthusiasm of high-level disclosures.
On Wednesday, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, expressed what has become a common frustration on Capitol Hill:
“What we’re seeing is . . . an avalanche of leaks. And it’s very, very disturbing. You know, it’s dismayed our allies. It puts American lives in jeopardy. It puts our nation’s security in jeopardy.”
Wednesday, June 06, 2012
Give a Listen to David Frizzell's "Say Hello To Heaven"
Country music star David Frizzell has helped raise awareness for the good cause supported by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) with a very moving new single, “Say Hello To Heaven.”
You can read a bit more about Frizzell, the record and MADD right here.
And just by clicking on the site, you'll begin to hear the song itself. It's really terrific.
As a son who lost his father to a drunk driver, I deeply appreciate the work of MADD and everyone who helps them out. And this song does that beautifully. My deepest appreciation then goes to David Frizzell and songwriter Buddy Hyatt for a very impressive and very moving song.
Thanks, guys.
(By the way, if you're interested in more of David Frizzell's music or his recent book about his brother, check out his web page right here.)
You can read a bit more about Frizzell, the record and MADD right here.
And just by clicking on the site, you'll begin to hear the song itself. It's really terrific.
As a son who lost his father to a drunk driver, I deeply appreciate the work of MADD and everyone who helps them out. And this song does that beautifully. My deepest appreciation then goes to David Frizzell and songwriter Buddy Hyatt for a very impressive and very moving song.
Thanks, guys.
(By the way, if you're interested in more of David Frizzell's music or his recent book about his brother, check out his web page right here.)
Tyranny Is Not Just A Potential Threat: It's Beginning
Cases in point?
* An esteemed pro-life organization has its computers seized as judges and cops go along with a disgruntled Democrat whose backing for ObamaCare caused him to lose an election.
* A man tries to remove -- from his own yard -- a politician's yard signs and is beaten up by three thugs while a party crowd across the street (a crowd which includes not only the said politician but a high-ranking policeman) do nothing. And the politician (she's running to be a judge!) and the police are not even bothered by the crime.
* In keeping with the tradition of police, attorneys general, politicians and journalists to ignore the undercover videos revealing crimes perpetrated by Planned Parenthood, the same groups are ignoring the recent videos which demonstrate Planned Parenthood staffers arranging for criminal abortions because of the "wrong" gender of the preborn child.
* Barack Obama's Justice Department led by Eric Holder...Oh my, that's a whole book in itself. Fast and Furious, contempt of Congress, protection of thugs who intimidate and defraud voters, persecution of innocent pro-lifers...We could be here a long while.
* An esteemed pro-life organization has its computers seized as judges and cops go along with a disgruntled Democrat whose backing for ObamaCare caused him to lose an election.
* A man tries to remove -- from his own yard -- a politician's yard signs and is beaten up by three thugs while a party crowd across the street (a crowd which includes not only the said politician but a high-ranking policeman) do nothing. And the politician (she's running to be a judge!) and the police are not even bothered by the crime.
* In keeping with the tradition of police, attorneys general, politicians and journalists to ignore the undercover videos revealing crimes perpetrated by Planned Parenthood, the same groups are ignoring the recent videos which demonstrate Planned Parenthood staffers arranging for criminal abortions because of the "wrong" gender of the preborn child.
* Barack Obama's Justice Department led by Eric Holder...Oh my, that's a whole book in itself. Fast and Furious, contempt of Congress, protection of thugs who intimidate and defraud voters, persecution of innocent pro-lifers...We could be here a long while.
TV Networks: "Guardian Angels" for Planned Parenthood
...Live Action has come out with two videos showing Planned Parenthood staffers actively assisting a Live Action actor to procure a sex-selection abortion. In the week after the story broke, the networks gave zero coverage to the Live Action reports. (Cable outlets CNN and Fox News have both given the Live Action videos coverage.) The videos coincided with a House vote to ban sex-selection abortion, which the networks also completely ignored.
The broadcast networks’ silence regarding the Live Action videos is standard operating procedure when it comes to negative news about Planned Parenthood. But when cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure planned to stop giving less than a million dollars a year to Planned Parenthood, the networks unleashed a blitz of stories against the cancer charity...
And you still think that that you're learning real news when you're watching the TV's evening "news" programs -- real news that is based on facts, that is relevant to your life and values, and that is free from a slavish dependence on big business, political-correctness, and celebrity worship?
Think again, Binky.
The broadcast networks’ silence regarding the Live Action videos is standard operating procedure when it comes to negative news about Planned Parenthood. But when cancer charity Susan G. Komen for the Cure planned to stop giving less than a million dollars a year to Planned Parenthood, the networks unleashed a blitz of stories against the cancer charity...
And you still think that that you're learning real news when you're watching the TV's evening "news" programs -- real news that is based on facts, that is relevant to your life and values, and that is free from a slavish dependence on big business, political-correctness, and celebrity worship?
Think again, Binky.
The Supreme Court Is Dissin' Obama
Is the Supreme Court, even with all those unprofessional and extremely liberal members on it, voting against the Barack Obama administration?
Again and again?
Could Team Obama's dreams of unlimited federal power be so grandiose, so overreaching, so doggone unconstitutional that even the leftists on the Court have to opt out?
The answer is yes.
Indeed, the Court has already done so in three key cases -- and that certainly gives freedom-loving Americans hope regarding the Supremes' decision on ObamaCare.
Here's the details in an important Wall Street Journal article written by Ilya Shapiro -- "Why Obama Strikes Out In Court."
Again and again?
Could Team Obama's dreams of unlimited federal power be so grandiose, so overreaching, so doggone unconstitutional that even the leftists on the Court have to opt out?
The answer is yes.
Indeed, the Court has already done so in three key cases -- and that certainly gives freedom-loving Americans hope regarding the Supremes' decision on ObamaCare.
Here's the details in an important Wall Street Journal article written by Ilya Shapiro -- "Why Obama Strikes Out In Court."
Topics:
Culture Wars,
Freedom Issues,
Nanny State,
National Politics,
The Courts
Walker Victory Hits Hard at "Public" Unions
The victory of Governor Scott Walker last night in Wisconsin represented what Professor Hunter Baker calls a "body blow to government unions."
Hunter continues, "While the election represents a major setback for public unions (whose perks and benefits are low-hanging fruit in a time of budget crises), it demonstrates a healthy civic impulse and clear-sightedness on the part of voters."
"The decision to retain Governor Walker demonstrates an ability on the part of voters to discern the difference between private unions (which can be a perfectly legitimate part of a free-market negotiating process) and public unions (which are a different sort of creature). Public unions create a class of voters (government-union members) who are able to promise money and support to the people making decisions about their pay packages and work conditions. It is anything but an arm’s length transaction made in the interest of all citizens."
"The process highlights the way narrow interests can exploit apathy on the part of the public to gain concentrated benefits. The situation is made worse by the fact that many of the benefits (such as pension promises) don’t come due until well in the future, when feckless decision-makers have long since left office and need not face the music. The public union is a Tocquevillian nightmare."
"There is little incentive (other than fiscal responsibility, an exceedingly rare virtue) for executives like Scott Walker to rein them in. But he did it anyway. Walker bet his term on drawing attention to the way public unions act against the public interest. He paid a price in having to fight a determined recall. But last night, he was vindicated."
"The people of Wisconsin have decided to reject the kind of government that rewards organized public employees with perks and promises well beyond those available to the vast majority of Americans working in the private sector. In so doing, they have taken an important step in equalizing the playing field between those holding government jobs and those working in the private economy that supports the government jobs."
For other stories about last night's election, check out the links I've posted on my Facebook page.
Hunter continues, "While the election represents a major setback for public unions (whose perks and benefits are low-hanging fruit in a time of budget crises), it demonstrates a healthy civic impulse and clear-sightedness on the part of voters."
"The decision to retain Governor Walker demonstrates an ability on the part of voters to discern the difference between private unions (which can be a perfectly legitimate part of a free-market negotiating process) and public unions (which are a different sort of creature). Public unions create a class of voters (government-union members) who are able to promise money and support to the people making decisions about their pay packages and work conditions. It is anything but an arm’s length transaction made in the interest of all citizens."
"The process highlights the way narrow interests can exploit apathy on the part of the public to gain concentrated benefits. The situation is made worse by the fact that many of the benefits (such as pension promises) don’t come due until well in the future, when feckless decision-makers have long since left office and need not face the music. The public union is a Tocquevillian nightmare."
"There is little incentive (other than fiscal responsibility, an exceedingly rare virtue) for executives like Scott Walker to rein them in. But he did it anyway. Walker bet his term on drawing attention to the way public unions act against the public interest. He paid a price in having to fight a determined recall. But last night, he was vindicated."
"The people of Wisconsin have decided to reject the kind of government that rewards organized public employees with perks and promises well beyond those available to the vast majority of Americans working in the private sector. In so doing, they have taken an important step in equalizing the playing field between those holding government jobs and those working in the private economy that supports the government jobs."
For other stories about last night's election, check out the links I've posted on my Facebook page.
ObamaCare Raises Students' Insurance Costs Over 1000%
Heavens to Betsy, young Americans who still think Barack Obama wants to give them hope and change need to check out Avik Roy's enlightening (and alarming) article in Forbes. Here's a bit of it. Last March, I wrote a detailed piece on why Obamacare will dramatically increase the cost of insurance for young people. Yesterday, Louise Radnofsky of the Wall Street Journal reported that some colleges are dropping their student health plans for the new academic year, because the new law increases the cost of those plans by as much as 1,112 percent. And no, that’s not a typo.
Most college students are in the peak of health. Hence, covering their health care is usually a pretty easy thing to do. A number of colleges—particularly small, private liberal-arts institutions—offer their students what are called “limited-benefit” plans, which cover health expenses up to a defined cap, such as $10,000. Because expenses are capped, these plans are extremely inexpensive, with premiums ranging from $150-500 per year.
However, Obamacare prohibits capping insurance payouts, causing premiums to skyrocket. For 2013-2014, the law prohibits caps below $500,000 per year; after 2014, caps are banned entirely...
At the State University of New York in Plattsburgh, she writes, the 2011-2012 school-year premium was $440 per student. Next year’s plan will cost between $1,300 and $1,600.
Lenoir-Rhyne University in Hickory, N.C. paid $245 per student per year for 2011-2012. Next year, they’ll have to pay $2,507 to meet the law’s requirements. The University of Puget Sound in Tacoma, Wash. paid even less last year—$165 a year—but will have to pay between $1,500 and $2,000 next year: more than twelve times their current insurance costs.
What’s the Obama administration’s response to this carnage? Effectively it’s this: that people should pay more for insurance, because it’s for their own good. ..
Give the Good Doctor Your Organs...Even If You're Not Done With Them Yet!
With the erosion of the sanctity of life ethic, the economic motivations which limit medical care and encourage "checkbook euthanasia," the ever-changing definitions of what is erroneously called "brain death," and the push for more and more organ transplant operations, you just knew you'd be reading more stories like this one from Good Morning America and Yahoo News.
The severe shortage of viable organs for transplantation in the U.S. has led a transplant surgeon to propose harvesting kidneys from people who are not dead yet.
Dr. Paul Morrissey, an associate professor of surgery at Brown University's Alpert Medical School, wrote in The American Journal of Bioethics that the protocol known as donation after cardiac death -- meaning death as a result of irreversible damage to the cardiovascular system -- has increased the number of organs available for transplant, but has a number of limitations, including the need to wait until the heart stops…
[Morrissey] argues in favor of procuring kidneys from patients with severe irreversible brain injury whose families consent to kidney removal before their cardiac and respiratory systems stop functioning.
"These individuals, maintained on mechanical ventilation, do not meet the criteria for brain death," he wrote. In these cases, the patient would be removed from life support and kidneys would be harvested while ensuring that the patient receives anesthesia and pain relief during the operation. After that, the patients would be kept comfortable until they have not had a pulse for five minutes, a threshold at which they are declared dead...
Kidney removal, he stressed, would not cause the death of the donor, which is "instead caused foremost by the original catastrophic injury and secondarily by terminating mechanical ventilation."...
A number of experts responded to Morrissey's proposal in commentaries published in the same journal. Some supported his arguments, while others expressed concern that it wouldn't be in the donor's best interests and could potentially violate medical ethics and the law...
The severe shortage of viable organs for transplantation in the U.S. has led a transplant surgeon to propose harvesting kidneys from people who are not dead yet.
Dr. Paul Morrissey, an associate professor of surgery at Brown University's Alpert Medical School, wrote in The American Journal of Bioethics that the protocol known as donation after cardiac death -- meaning death as a result of irreversible damage to the cardiovascular system -- has increased the number of organs available for transplant, but has a number of limitations, including the need to wait until the heart stops…
[Morrissey] argues in favor of procuring kidneys from patients with severe irreversible brain injury whose families consent to kidney removal before their cardiac and respiratory systems stop functioning.
"These individuals, maintained on mechanical ventilation, do not meet the criteria for brain death," he wrote. In these cases, the patient would be removed from life support and kidneys would be harvested while ensuring that the patient receives anesthesia and pain relief during the operation. After that, the patients would be kept comfortable until they have not had a pulse for five minutes, a threshold at which they are declared dead...
Kidney removal, he stressed, would not cause the death of the donor, which is "instead caused foremost by the original catastrophic injury and secondarily by terminating mechanical ventilation."...
A number of experts responded to Morrissey's proposal in commentaries published in the same journal. Some supported his arguments, while others expressed concern that it wouldn't be in the donor's best interests and could potentially violate medical ethics and the law...
Topics:
Bioethics,
Eugenics,
Hall of Shame,
Health
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
The Pace Picks Up
With Claire feeling better and the major lawn and garden projects now behind us, we're getting back to our regular frenzied pace. Yesterday it was blogging, finishing the new volume of "When Swing Was King," painting, celebrating Barb Malek's new book and enjoying a late night visit with Mark Morin. This morning it was a morning coffee conversation with John Malek, writing the June LifeSharer letter and doing the little bit of blogging that is posted below.
And the rest of today? A bit more research for my commentary on the new WSWK volume, an afternoon presentation at Heritage Point, Claire getting a needed replacement for her cell phone, finishing our painting project, securing details for next week's Governing Board meeting, and starting in on the LifeSharer letter. That means Claire typing it up, my editing it, printing the envelopes, printing the letter, stamps for the envelopes, stuffing 'em in and mailing. The goal? Getting it to the Post Office by 5:30 tomorrow night.
Tomorrow will be sidewalk counseling and praying at the Planned Parenthood abortion mill, working on the LifeSharer letter, mowing and watering the lawn...and perhaps even a few posts on Vital Signs Blog.
But, of course, the most important take-away from all of the above is that marvelous phrase "Claire feeling better." Thank You, Lord. And thanks to all who prayed for her in these last few months.
And the rest of today? A bit more research for my commentary on the new WSWK volume, an afternoon presentation at Heritage Point, Claire getting a needed replacement for her cell phone, finishing our painting project, securing details for next week's Governing Board meeting, and starting in on the LifeSharer letter. That means Claire typing it up, my editing it, printing the envelopes, printing the letter, stamps for the envelopes, stuffing 'em in and mailing. The goal? Getting it to the Post Office by 5:30 tomorrow night.
Tomorrow will be sidewalk counseling and praying at the Planned Parenthood abortion mill, working on the LifeSharer letter, mowing and watering the lawn...and perhaps even a few posts on Vital Signs Blog.
But, of course, the most important take-away from all of the above is that marvelous phrase "Claire feeling better." Thank You, Lord. And thanks to all who prayed for her in these last few months.
Only Liberals Are Important: The Nat Hentoff Case
"When journalist Dan Rather was revealed to have poor news judgment, if not outright malice, for using fake documents to try and change the course of a presidential election, he was given a new TV show and a book deal -- not to mention a guest spot on The Daily Show. The media has even attempted a resuscitation of anti-Semite Helen Thomas, who was recently interviewed in Playboy."
Those are much different reactions than the ones given to Nat Hentoff, skilled writer, famed civil libertarian advocate, and one of America's premier jazz critics, when he experienced a dramatic life change. For Hentoff's change was politically-incorrect to the max. He had become a pro-lifer.
"Hentoff, a Guggenheim fellow and author of dozens of books, was a pariah. Several of his colleagues at the Village Voice, which had run his column since the 1950s, stopped talking to him. When the National Press Foundation wanted to give him a lifetime achievement award, there was a bitter debate amongst members whether Hentoff should even be honored (he was). Then they stopped running his columns. You heard his name less and less. In December 2008, the Village Voice officially let him go."
Read more of Mark Judge's excellent article "Blackballing Nat Hentoff" right here.
Those are much different reactions than the ones given to Nat Hentoff, skilled writer, famed civil libertarian advocate, and one of America's premier jazz critics, when he experienced a dramatic life change. For Hentoff's change was politically-incorrect to the max. He had become a pro-lifer.
"Hentoff, a Guggenheim fellow and author of dozens of books, was a pariah. Several of his colleagues at the Village Voice, which had run his column since the 1950s, stopped talking to him. When the National Press Foundation wanted to give him a lifetime achievement award, there was a bitter debate amongst members whether Hentoff should even be honored (he was). Then they stopped running his columns. You heard his name less and less. In December 2008, the Village Voice officially let him go."
Read more of Mark Judge's excellent article "Blackballing Nat Hentoff" right here.
Oh Yes; Religious Freedom Is Being Denied in America
Wedding Photographer May Be Required (on Pain of Legal Liability) to Photograph Same-Sex Commitment Ceremonies
So the New Mexico Court of Appeals held last week in the long-pending Elane Photography v. Willock (N.M. Ct. App. May 31, 2012). The court began by holding that the state law that bans sexual orientation discrimination in places of public accommodation applies to professional wedding photographers’ decisions not to photograph same-sex commitment ceremonies: Such photography businesses are “places of public accommodation” under the language of the law, and the discrimination between legally recognized opposite-sex marriages (New Mexico only recognizes such marriages) and same-sex commitment ceremonies constitutes discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The court then rejected the argument of the photographer (Elane Huguenin, the co-owner and principal photographer for Elane Photography) that penalizing her for not photographing such same-sex ceremonies was an unconstitutional “speech compulsion.” The First Amendment, Huguenin argued, has been repeatedly held to protect the right to speak as well as the right not to speak; and the right not to speak includes the right not to create artistic expression that one doesn’t want to create. And just as the First Amendment protects speech that is said for money (indeed, most books, newspapers, movies, and the like are created and distributed commercially), so it protects the right not to create certain artistic works for money, even if one is in that line of business. But the court disagreed...
Eugene Volokh has more on his blog right here.
So the New Mexico Court of Appeals held last week in the long-pending Elane Photography v. Willock (N.M. Ct. App. May 31, 2012). The court began by holding that the state law that bans sexual orientation discrimination in places of public accommodation applies to professional wedding photographers’ decisions not to photograph same-sex commitment ceremonies: Such photography businesses are “places of public accommodation” under the language of the law, and the discrimination between legally recognized opposite-sex marriages (New Mexico only recognizes such marriages) and same-sex commitment ceremonies constitutes discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The court then rejected the argument of the photographer (Elane Huguenin, the co-owner and principal photographer for Elane Photography) that penalizing her for not photographing such same-sex ceremonies was an unconstitutional “speech compulsion.” The First Amendment, Huguenin argued, has been repeatedly held to protect the right to speak as well as the right not to speak; and the right not to speak includes the right not to create artistic expression that one doesn’t want to create. And just as the First Amendment protects speech that is said for money (indeed, most books, newspapers, movies, and the like are created and distributed commercially), so it protects the right not to create certain artistic works for money, even if one is in that line of business. But the court disagreed...
Eugene Volokh has more on his blog right here.
Supermodel Talks About Faith, Life...and Other Stuff
Kathy Ireland is really terrific here. Do pass this clip around. And for information on her books, check out this Amazon page.
Monday, June 04, 2012
From the "Tail Wagging the Dog" Department: Only 2% Are Gay
If your perceptions of American society are shaped by television (and, sad to say, those of most Americans are), then you believe that around 25% of Americans are homosexual. That's an astounding increase from the 10% figure stated by Alfred Kinsey in his reports from the 1950s which were, for many decades, widely cited by educators and politicians.
So which percentage is correct?
Neither comes close. Try 2%.
Garance Franke-Ruta, a senior editor at The Atlantic, has written a rather surprising article for that publication ("Americans Have No Idea How Few Gay People There Are") in which she shares the 2% finding...and several other interesting things.
For instance, one is forced to ponder the inordinate social and political impact that this homosexual minority has managed to create. Stuart Gaffney, a leading same-sex marriage advocate, is quoted in the article, "My first reaction to [the Gallup information], aside from a little chuckle, is that it's actually a sign of the success of the movement for LGBT rights. We are a small minority, and we will never have full equality without the support of the majority, and a poll like that suggests the majority is extremely aware of their gay neighbors, coworkers, and friends."
Americans are quick to jump on bandwagons. They are extremely fashion-conscious and devoted to following whatever trends are "in." And there's no doubt that the homosexual lobby has successfully exploited this gullibility. Using the media, celebrities, liberal politicians and the establishment education system, the pro-homosexual lobby has created an illusion -- but one that has been dramatically influential.
Change perceptions and you eventually change realities.
Oscar Wilde once referred to homosexuality as "the sin that dared not speak its name." A modern writer (also homosexual) describes it now as "the sin that won't shut up." But it is also a sin that won't "fess up." That is, homosexual leaders are so committed to implementing their agenda that they won't tell the truth. They hide the actual numbers because it would be detrimental to their cause. After all, Americans jump on bandwagons, not tricycles.
Homosexual leaders also hide facts that would be even more devastating to their cause, like the bizarre and disease-ridden practices homosexuals employ (which are driving up everyone's insurance payments), the insistence on removing all opposition (including the religious freedom of the majority), and the all-too-clear pronouncements from the Bible about God's judgment on individuals (and nations) who promote sexual perversion.
Imagine. All this press and political posturing about same-sex marriage. All the coercive sensitivity training courses. All the decrees by government agencies for LGBT special privileges. All the gay characters in television programs.
And yet only 2% of Americans are actually homosexual.
Do you think other forces are at work too?
So which percentage is correct?
Neither comes close. Try 2%.
Garance Franke-Ruta, a senior editor at The Atlantic, has written a rather surprising article for that publication ("Americans Have No Idea How Few Gay People There Are") in which she shares the 2% finding...and several other interesting things.
For instance, one is forced to ponder the inordinate social and political impact that this homosexual minority has managed to create. Stuart Gaffney, a leading same-sex marriage advocate, is quoted in the article, "My first reaction to [the Gallup information], aside from a little chuckle, is that it's actually a sign of the success of the movement for LGBT rights. We are a small minority, and we will never have full equality without the support of the majority, and a poll like that suggests the majority is extremely aware of their gay neighbors, coworkers, and friends."
Americans are quick to jump on bandwagons. They are extremely fashion-conscious and devoted to following whatever trends are "in." And there's no doubt that the homosexual lobby has successfully exploited this gullibility. Using the media, celebrities, liberal politicians and the establishment education system, the pro-homosexual lobby has created an illusion -- but one that has been dramatically influential.
Change perceptions and you eventually change realities.
Oscar Wilde once referred to homosexuality as "the sin that dared not speak its name." A modern writer (also homosexual) describes it now as "the sin that won't shut up." But it is also a sin that won't "fess up." That is, homosexual leaders are so committed to implementing their agenda that they won't tell the truth. They hide the actual numbers because it would be detrimental to their cause. After all, Americans jump on bandwagons, not tricycles.
Homosexual leaders also hide facts that would be even more devastating to their cause, like the bizarre and disease-ridden practices homosexuals employ (which are driving up everyone's insurance payments), the insistence on removing all opposition (including the religious freedom of the majority), and the all-too-clear pronouncements from the Bible about God's judgment on individuals (and nations) who promote sexual perversion.
Imagine. All this press and political posturing about same-sex marriage. All the coercive sensitivity training courses. All the decrees by government agencies for LGBT special privileges. All the gay characters in television programs.
And yet only 2% of Americans are actually homosexual.
Do you think other forces are at work too?
Topics:
Culture Wars,
Hall of Shame,
Homosexuality,
Marriage
"When Swing Was King" Swings Into June
This afternoon I'm putting the final touches on the latest "When Swing Was King" volume in order to be ready to start June's schedule tomorrow at Heritage Point Assisted Living Center. It will be the first in our regular monthly "tour" of 11 different facilities (last month we threw in an extra presentation for Crowell Home up in Blair) and we are, as always, looking forward to it.Anytime you'd like to come along to join in the fun, please consider yourselves more than welcome. The schedule is on the Vital Signs Ministries website.
The program for Volume 15? Here it is:
1) Glenn Miller Orchestra, "Moonlight Serenade."
2) Doris Day, "You Oughta' Be In Pictures" (featuring photos of Hollywood's leading men of the 1940s)
3) Artie Shaw Orchestra, "Frenesi."
4) Benny Goodman Orchestra with Ella Fitzgerald, "Goodnight, My Love."
5) Jan Garber Orchestra, "I'll See You In My Dreams."
6) Tommy Dorsey Orchestra with Frank Sinatra, "Dolores."
7) Guy Lombardo Orchestra, "Embraceable You."
8) Count Basie Orchestra, "April In Paris."
9) Freddie Martin Orchestra, "Dancing In The Dark."
10) Bing Crosby, "You Belong To My Heart."
11) Ted Weems Orchestra, "Heartaches."
12) The Mills Brothers, "Standin' On The Corner."
13) Jimmy Dorsey Orchestra, "So Rare."
Obama Snubs Poland...Again
Obama's snubbing of Walesa follows several peculiar actions that upset the people of Poland. On September 17, 2009, he canceled plans for a joint missile defense system between the United States and Poland, one of our most dependable post-Cold War NATO allies. Obama did so for pro-Russian reasons. His action on that particular date was stunning: It was precisely 70 years to the day, September 17, 1939, when Russia invaded Poland, in compliance with the sinister Hitler-Stalin Pact. Poles certainly noticed the irony.
Obama's snubbing of Walesa also follows his recent private assurance to Dmitri Medvedev and Vladimir Putin -- inadvertently caught on tape by an open mic -- that, in regard to missile defense and nuclear issues, he would "have more flexibility" "after my election." In other words, more pro-Russia steps at Poland's expense.
Obama's snubbing of Walesa also came alongside a terrible gaffe about "Polish death camps."
Obama's staff seems surprised that Poles reacted so suspiciously to Obama's gaffe. Gee, I wonder why they're suspicious...
Oh, my. You've got to read the rest of "Obama's Walesa Moment: A Snub Heard Round the World" by Paul Kengor over at The American Spectator.
Obama's snubbing of Walesa also follows his recent private assurance to Dmitri Medvedev and Vladimir Putin -- inadvertently caught on tape by an open mic -- that, in regard to missile defense and nuclear issues, he would "have more flexibility" "after my election." In other words, more pro-Russia steps at Poland's expense.
Obama's snubbing of Walesa also came alongside a terrible gaffe about "Polish death camps."
Obama's staff seems surprised that Poles reacted so suspiciously to Obama's gaffe. Gee, I wonder why they're suspicious...
Oh, my. You've got to read the rest of "Obama's Walesa Moment: A Snub Heard Round the World" by Paul Kengor over at The American Spectator.
It's Queen Elizabeth's Fault
In case you were wondering, it turns out that the woeful condition of modern Great Britain can be blamed on...get ready for it...Queen Elizabeth!
That's right. The failed economy, the unemployment, the crime, the death of social graces, the surrender of national sovereignty, the traffic congestion -- all these and more have occurred during the Queen's watch. Ergo? Blame her for it.
Never mind that the Queen has served for 60 years with remarkable grace and selfless dedication. And never mind that the British monarchy hasn't had any real political power since Victoria died.
Since the caustic clods of the Fourth Estate dare not point to the real cause of modern Britain's ills -- and that would be excessive liberalism -- they prefer to find another patsy, no matter how genuinely blameless, to take the rap.
Thus this poorly written story created by Reuters, "UK has changed for worse under Queen Elizabeth." Good grief.
That's right. The failed economy, the unemployment, the crime, the death of social graces, the surrender of national sovereignty, the traffic congestion -- all these and more have occurred during the Queen's watch. Ergo? Blame her for it.
Never mind that the Queen has served for 60 years with remarkable grace and selfless dedication. And never mind that the British monarchy hasn't had any real political power since Victoria died.
Since the caustic clods of the Fourth Estate dare not point to the real cause of modern Britain's ills -- and that would be excessive liberalism -- they prefer to find another patsy, no matter how genuinely blameless, to take the rap.
Thus this poorly written story created by Reuters, "UK has changed for worse under Queen Elizabeth." Good grief.
Topics:
Hall of Shame,
Media Matters
Dems Won't Oppose Abortion...Even For Sex Selection?
Yes, everyone knows that the Democrat Party and the nation's largest abortion company, Planned Parenthood, have long been the leading supporters of abortion-on-demand policies in the United States. But did anyone actually imagine that their zealotry would lead them to oppose even those abortions which were specifically directed at killing females in the womb?
It's incredible. It's outrageous. But, alas; it's true. Here are a few of the must-read stories about this tragedy.
Abortion and Girls: Pro-Choice Now Equals Pro-Gendercide and Sponsor, Pro-Lifers: Democrats Blocked Sex-Selection Abortion Ban by LifeNews.com's Steven Ertelt and Planned Parenthood Denies Equal Rights for Unborn Feminists by Matt Barber.
It's incredible. It's outrageous. But, alas; it's true. Here are a few of the must-read stories about this tragedy.
Abortion and Girls: Pro-Choice Now Equals Pro-Gendercide and Sponsor, Pro-Lifers: Democrats Blocked Sex-Selection Abortion Ban by LifeNews.com's Steven Ertelt and Planned Parenthood Denies Equal Rights for Unborn Feminists by Matt Barber.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








































