Thursday, March 01, 2012
Protecting the Rights of Conscience
In particular, the rights of devout Christians have been trampled. In the name of tolerance, Christian views on sexuality, decency, religious freedom, the right of assembly, marriage, parental rights, and expressions of faith in the public square are no longer...well, tolerated.
And, of course, with Barack Obama's dramatic escalation of this war on Christian conscience, things are going to get much worse -- real quick.
That is why pastors, professionals and citizens in general need to strongly support such common-sense defensive measures as Nebraska's LB 461.
Dave Bydalek of Family First has put together an excellent primer on just why the passage of Nebraska's LB 461 (Protecting Conscience Rights in Health Care) is so crucial. I urge you to carefully consider Dave's argument and then use it to stimulate and inform your letters, e-mails and phone calls to your state senators.
Why protect conscience rights in health care?
1. Protect patient access to health care.
Protecting the freedom of conscience of healthcare providers and institutions is necessary to avoid added stress on an already overtaxed healthcare system. Without conscience protections, healthcare access for hundreds of thousands of patients nationwide will be threatened and healthcare costs will rise because of the lack of facilities to provide needed services.
Conscience protection is the only way to en sure access to health care, which is increasingly threatened by the aggressive politicization of health professions to drive away persons of conscience. Each year, one in six patients is cared for in a Catholic hospital. Without conscience protections, many faith-based hospitals and providers who provide services to millions of patients may shut down, limiting access to needed services.
Over nine in ten physicians in a national poll agreed, "I would rather stop practicing medicine altogether than be forced to violate my conscience." Driving faith-based professionals out of medicine would strand hundreds of thousands of patients, especially those in rural vicinities who rely on only a few doctors in their areas.
2. Preserve the patient-physician relationship.
Conscience protections are essential to preserve the exclusive patient-physician relationship. Without it, the government will be able to effectively limit where patients can go for care.
If the government does not protect life-honoring healthcare professionals and institutions from being forced to perform procedures they are morally opposed to, patients will no longer be able to choose such professionals and institutions. This takes choices way from patients, who often want to choose a provider who shares their core values.
3. Protect healthcare professionals with moral, ethical and religious convictions from discrimination.
Faith-based healthcare professionals report widespread discrimination because of conscience. A national survey released by The Polling Company, Inc. reveals that: 32% have “been pressured to refer a patient for a procedure to which [they] had moral, ethical, or religious objections.
26% have “been pressured to write a prescription for a medication to which [they] had moral, ethical, or religious objections. 33% have “considered not pursuing a career in a particular medical specialty because of attitudes prevalent in that specialty that is not considered tolerant of [their] moral, ethical or religious beliefs.”
4. LB 461 provides a mechanism for legally protecting conscience rights.
LB 461 provides that health care providers have the right not to participate in any health care function that violates his or her conscience. Likewise, health care facilities have the right not to participate in any health care function that violates its conscience. LB 461 provides a civil action for damages or injunctive relief for any violation of the Health Care Freedom Act.
All of the pro-life groups in Nebraska have expressed concern for seeing the rights of conscience protected under Nebraska law.