Friday, February 01, 2008

The Democrats' Unexpected Silence on Embryonic Stem Cells

Whatever happened to the ESCR issue that Democrats considered such a "winning wedge" against their Republican opponents in this election, the issue that was so persistently, piercingly raised by pundits and newspaper cartoonists all over America?

The stem cell breakthrough of last fall has all but shut them up tight.

It was written a few weeks ago, but here's a couple of excerpts from an excellent Sean Higgins article in Investor's Business Daily about this matter that aptly describes what happened.

...In one fell swoop the politics of the issue shifted, says Ramesh Ponnuru, a harsh critique of the Democrats' stem cell policy and author of The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life. "I am not surprised to see that politicians running for office on the Democratic side are talking about this issue less because there is not as much profit to it anymore," Ponnuru said.

Democrats had downplayed the possibility that adult stem cells could be used as an alternative. They argued instead that embryonic cells represented the cutting edge of science.
"Now that same argument can be turned against them," Ponnuru said. "If they want to go based on clinical results, adult stem cells are better. If they want to go based on which has more promise, these (new) alternatives are better."...

Democrats such as Rep. James Langevin of Rhode Island say that the recent innovations haven't eliminated the need for embryonic research because it still offers the most promise.
The issue doesn't come up in debates these days, Langevin says, only "because it's not an issue the candidates are divided on . . . I think every one of us is pretty much in lockstep."

Nevertheless, Langevin concedes that the new avenues of research are "certainly exciting" and that won't make the case for overturning the cap any easier.
"The president has twice now vetoed legislation to remove the restrictions he put in place." Langevin said. "It's unclear whether the Democratic leadership will bring it up again because we don't have the votes to override."

Democrats had been counting on more Republicans to flip and vote with them. That prospect now looks dim.


In other words, Ron Reagan likely will stay home next year and watch the Democratic convention on TV.