data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c34ea/c34ea7a47c7c9b51d7eea12e3f4681ad2554d4eb" alt=""
However, Mr. Obama has shrewdly anticipated his vulnerability in a general election on this issue and has taken measures to appear more moderate. He has repeatedly stated that he seeks common ground with pro-lifers — especially in finding ways to reduce the number of abortions. He thus supports sex education that includes a curriculum on abstinence. He formed a National Catholic Advisory Council, that consists of prominent Democratic pro-lifers, in order to signal more tolerance in his party. He also cosponsored an abortion-prevention bill in January 2005. He even has a Pro Life Obama group on his Web site consisting of pro-life supporters; they applaud his commitment to reducing the number of abortions. Hence, Mr. Obama has put a silver glove on a barbaric voting record.
Mr. McCain, on the other hand, has been just as shrewd but in the completely opposite sense. He has a stalwart pro-life voting record; this includes deleting family planning grants from spending bills, opposing Medicaid funds for abortions in cases of rape or incest and favoring abstinence-only sex education. It is no wonder that Planned Parenthood has given him a zero lifetime rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51186/5118666fee90beb4f827be3755e2353ca3fcc9a5" alt=""
Nonetheless, voters have a stark choice in contrasting rhetoric with reality on the abortion question: Mr. Obama speaks loudly but leaves the helpless to die; Mr. McCain says little but extends a merciful hand.
(Washington Times editorial, May 20)