
It is a superbly crafted film, full of tension and pathos and patriotic feeling -- a film that reminded us of a time when filmmakers invested their propaganda prowess in the national interest rather than the self-aggrandizing, smarmy sedition that has marked so many of the war-oriented films made since the 60's.
I most ardently recommend the film.
But, along with that, I also recommend popular author Andrew Klavan's perceptive article in City Journal that explores this very matter; namely, the divergence of attitudes and purposes between Hollywood's war films of yesterday (patriotic, uplifting, challenging the audience to join in the honorable pursuit of the just cause) and those anti-war productions of the modern era (moody, cynical, nihilistic...and boring).
The article is entitled "The Lost Art of War" and in it Klavan carefully examines the pronounced differences in plot, purpose and style of these competing film ideologies. With striking examples and perceptive insights into both the politics and artistry involved, Klavan makes a convincing case that the war films of Ford, Capra, Dwan, Ludwig, and others working in the 40's and 50's not only served the national interest much better than the leftist-themed movies of a later generation...but they were much better movies, period. More articulate. More dramatic. Truer to life. And immensely more popular with movie audiences.
So, before the weekend comes, make sure you read through Andrew Klavan's "The Lost Art of War" over there at City Journal. You'll find the piece refreshing, stimulating and with a few excellent ideas for what war movie classic you might pick up for Saturday night.