Thursday, June 18, 2009

Amanda Knox Case: New York Times Ignores the Evidence

...These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the Amanda Knox trial printed in the Times. The reason this is important is that this is how the Times portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless prosecutor railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the victim is a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.)

The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill criminal cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it child's play to see how egregiously the Times is lying this time.


I haven't been following this case but Ann Coulter certainly brought me up to speed. Perhaps more important, she reviews why I wouldn't have got the straight story anyway. Good reading.