data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c47d/1c47dcfde7a81b4521418e00a33592ac3d1afc27" alt=""
A tax increase is not necessary. As President Bush said, “Before we raise taxes which could affect economic growth, I would strongly urge the Congress to examine how they set priorities. And if bridges are a priority, let's make sure we set that priority first and foremost before we raise taxes.” The nation’s aging infrastructure is not a state secret. In 2005, when Congress was considering a major highway bill reauthorization, the American Society of Civil Engineers reported that more than a quarter of the nation’s bridges were structurally deficient or obsolete.
The 2005 highway bill contained $2 billion annually for bridge reconstruction. During its markup of the bill, the House Transportation Committee considered increasing that figure to $3 billion a year. The committee not only failed to include the higher level of bridge repair funding, it opened the door for members of Congress to stuff the bill with nearly 6,500 pork-barrel projects worth more than $24 billion, about the same amount now being sought by Rep. Oberstar with his proposed tax increase. “High-priority” transportation projects in the 2005 legislation included $452 million for the infamous “Bridges to Nowhere” in Alaska, $5 million to improve air quality in the Sacramento region of California, $4 million to develop bicycle paths and public park space adjacent to the New River in Calexico, California, and $4 million for streetscape, pedestrian improvements in Clarkson, Georgia.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/917c9/917c99a7bffb5d016c4132398481714545a3111e" alt=""
The August 11 Rochester Post Bulletin quoted Rep. Oberstar as follows: "If you're not prepared to invest another five cents in bridge reconstruction and road reconstruction, then God help you." To which one might reply, “If members of Congress are not prepared to wisely spend the money they already have for bridge construction and road construction, then God help them.”
For seizing an opportunity to turn tragedy into tax increases and an unnecessary new trust fund, and for protecting transportation pork, CAGW names Rep. Jim Oberstar its August 2007 Porker of the Month.